MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/cpp.2132

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical psychology & psychotherapy · 2017

Are experiences of psychosis associated with unhelpful metacognitive coping strategies? A systematic review of the evidence.

Sellers Rachel, Wells Adrian, Morrison Anthony P

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This review investigated whether unhelpful metacognitive coping strategies, such as attentional biases, worry, rumination, and thought control, are associated with experiences of psychosis. These processes, known collectively as the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS), form a central tenet of the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model. Three research questions based on assumptions underlying the CAS were addressed. It was predicted that processes of (a) self-focused processing, (b) negative perseverative thinking (worry and rumination), and (c) counterproductive thought control would be associated with experiences of psychosis. A comprehensive search of the literature identified 51 eligible studies: 17 investigated self-focused attention, 25 investigated perseverative processing (worry: n = 18; rumination: n = 10), and 9 investigated thought control strategies. Findings indicated that unhelpful metacognitive coping strategies associated with the CAS are related to experiences of psychosis and appear to share important relationships with distress. Implications for future research and clinical practice are discussed.

Для цитирования: Sellers Rachel, Wells Adrian, Morrison Anthony P. Are experiences of psychosis associated with unhelpful metacognitive coping strategies? A systematic review of the evidence.. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2132.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.