The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2009
Disordered-eating attitudes in relation to bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover in overweight adolescents.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schvey Natasha A, Tanofsky-Kraff Marian, Yanoff Lisa B, Checchi Jenna M, Shomaker Lauren B, Brady Sheila, Savastano David M, Ranzenhofer Lisa M, Yanovski Susan Z, Reynolds James C, Yanovski Jack A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the relationships between cognitive eating restraint and both bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover in overweight adolescents.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven overweight (BMI 39.1 +/- 6.8 kg/m(2)) African American and Caucasian adolescent (age = 14.4 +/- 1.4 years) girls (66.4%) and boys were administered the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) interview and Eating Inventory (EI) questionnaire and underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure total lumbar spine BMD. Markers of bone formation (serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin), bone resorption (24-hour urine N-telopeptides), and stress (urine free cortisol) were measured.
RESULTS: After accounting for the contribution of demographics, height, weight, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and depressive symptoms, adolescents' weight concern, as assessed by interview, was a significant contributor to the model of urine free cortisol (beta = .30, p < .05). Shape concern, as also assessed by interview, was significantly associated with lumbar spine bone mineral density (beta = -.15, p < .05). Dietary restraint was not a significant predictor in any of these models.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that among severely overweight adolescents, dissatisfaction with shape and weight may be salient stressors. Future research is required to illuminate the relationship between bone health and disordered-eating attitudes in overweight adolescents.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven overweight (BMI 39.1 +/- 6.8 kg/m(2)) African American and Caucasian adolescent (age = 14.4 +/- 1.4 years) girls (66.4%) and boys were administered the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) interview and Eating Inventory (EI) questionnaire and underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure total lumbar spine BMD. Markers of bone formation (serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin), bone resorption (24-hour urine N-telopeptides), and stress (urine free cortisol) were measured.
RESULTS: After accounting for the contribution of demographics, height, weight, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and depressive symptoms, adolescents' weight concern, as assessed by interview, was a significant contributor to the model of urine free cortisol (beta = .30, p < .05). Shape concern, as also assessed by interview, was significantly associated with lumbar spine bone mineral density (beta = -.15, p < .05). Dietary restraint was not a significant predictor in any of these models.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that among severely overweight adolescents, dissatisfaction with shape and weight may be salient stressors. Future research is required to illuminate the relationship between bone health and disordered-eating attitudes in overweight adolescents.