MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Stomatologija · 2025

Dental anomalies in subjects with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.

Sakthivel Soundarya, Ajila Vidya, Babu Subhas, Shetty Vikram, Hegde Shruthi, Biswas Anwesha

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a common congenital defect where dental anomalies are seen at a higher rate compared to the general population. The study aimed to identify, compare and correlate dental anomalies in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate subjects.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with cleft lip and palate were evaluated for the presence of dental anomalies. After informed consent, clinical and radiological examination of the patients was performed. Cone beam computed tomography sections were analysed and dental anomalies present were recorded. The observations were tabulated and the data was subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety six percent of the cleft population had at least one dental anomaly. Patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate showed the highest prevalence of dental anomalies. Missing teeth (87%) were the most common dental anomaly followed by ectopic eruption, microdontia, enamel hypoplasia and impacted teeth. Other dental anomalies like odontomes and pulp stones were found at a lower prevalence rate.

CONCLUSION

Patients with CLP are highly susceptible to the occurrence of dental anomalies. Thorough clinical and radiographic examination, careful planning and implementation of specialized services are needed in an effort to provide early diagnosis and comprehensive treatment.

Для цитирования: Sakthivel Soundarya, Ajila Vidya, Babu Subhas, Shetty Vikram, Hegde Shruthi, Biswas Anwesha. Dental anomalies in subjects with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.. Stomatologija. 2025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.