MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0003489420906180

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2020

Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft: First Report and Genetic Analysis of Two Related Patients.

Masood Maheer M, Mieczkowski Piotr, Malc Ewa P, Foreman Ann Katherine M, Evans James P, Clark J Madison, Rose Austin S

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Congenital midline cervical cleft (CMCC) is a rare congenital anterior neck anatomical anomaly. We present the case of two related patients (grandchild and maternal grandmother) who were both born with a congenital midline cervical cleft along with genetic analysis.

METHODS

Clinical examination of both patients and surgical excision of the grandchild was performed. Genetic analysis with exome sequencing (ES) was conducted for both patients.

RESULTS

Genetic analysis with exome sequencing (ES) revealed apparently novel single nucleotide variants in 66 genes present in both proband and grandmother. Five of these variants are predicted to cause frameshifting in the coding region of the respective genes and truncated proteins (OVGP1, TYW1B, ZAN, SSPO, FOLR3). Two of these genes (TYW1B and SSPO) have homozygous indel mutations in both patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case of two related patients with a congenital midline cervical cleft. The results of our genetic analysis reveal potential relevance to CMCC development.

Для цитирования: Masood Maheer M, Mieczkowski Piotr, Malc Ewa P, Foreman Ann Katherine M, Evans James P, Clark J Madison, Rose Austin S. Congenital Midline Cervical Cleft: First Report and Genetic Analysis of Two Related Patients.. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0003489420906180.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.