DOI 10.1097/meg.0000000000003039
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy for intractable childhood constipation: a clinical observational and comparative study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on children with intractable constipation and compare treatment success between TENS application twice weekly and three times weekly.
METHODS
We recruited otherwise healthy consecutive children aged 6-17 years old suffering from intractable constipation over a 6-month period. Anatomic causes and organic pathologies were ruled out. All children received TENS treatment for 20 min, during 4 weeks, three times a week in group 1 and twice a week in group 2 for 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated for defecation frequency, stool consistency, symptom relief, and fecal incontinence before, at the first week, at the end, and 4 weeks after treatment was discontinued.
RESULTS
Twenty patients were enrolled in group 1 and 15 in group 2. Age, gender, and duration of constipation were indifferent among groups. After treatment, there was a significant increase in the number of weekly defecations ( P < 0.001), improvement in fecal incontinence ( P < 0.05), and painful defecation ( P < 0.001) in both groups; however, each group's improvements did not persist 4 weeks after the treatment's discontinuation ( P > 0.05). Meanwhile, twice weekly TENS was as effective as three-times weekly TENS ( P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
TENS treatment appears to improve weekly defecation, fecal incontinence, and pain in children with intractable constipation; however, effects are not sustained after discontinuation. The twice-weekly and three-times weekly protocols yielded comparable results; however, the study lacked sufficient power to conclusively demonstrate noninferiority.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.