DOI 10.1097/yct.0000000000000993
Use of ECT for Children With and Without Catatonia: A Single-Site Retrospective Analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
The objective study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a retrospective cohort of pediatric patients.
METHODS
A single-site retrospective analysis was conducted of patients aged younger than 18 years who received ECT in a private university hospital from January 28, 2012 to April 8, 2023. Treatment efficacy and adverse events were determined retrospectively through review of the medical record.
RESULTS
A total of 36 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Catatonia was the most common presenting indication for ECT, followed by psychosis and suicidal ideation. For all patients, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale scores indicated that it was very likely for a subject to experience at least "much improvement" with the estimated probability of receiving a Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale score better than 3 of 0.852 (t.s. = 16.3; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.711-0.931). All patients with catatonia demonstrated a positive clinical response and experienced a statistically significant reduction in total Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale scores observed ( t = 11.9; df = 20; SD = 6.3; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 12.6-17.9). No significant adverse events were reported for any patient in the cohort. However, 14 (38.9%) patients experienced prolonged seizures, all of which were terminated with propofol (mean, 49.7 mg).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides further data supporting the safe and effective use of pediatric ECT in the treatment of various psychiatric conditions. However, more research is needed to determine the risk factors associated with prolonged seizures and the optimal seizure parameters in young people.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.