Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2004
Beta-blockers prevent subacute recurrences of persistent atrial fibrillation only in patients with hypertension.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Noord Trudeke, Tieleman Robert G, Bosker Hans A, Kingma Tsjerk, Van Veldhuisen Dirk J, Crijns Harry J G M, Van Gelder Isabelle C
Аннотация
AIM: Differential drug treatment guided by the underlying heart disease may improve outcome of rhythm control therapy. In the present study we investigated in a well-defined group with either lone atrial fibrillation (AF) or hypertension whether there were differences in rhythm control outcome between both groups in relation to the use of cardiovascular drugs.
METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients were included after successful cardioversion of persistent AF. None of the patients was given a class I or III antiarrhythmic drug. Patients' heart rhythm was checked 3 times a day, using transtelephonic monitoring for 1 month after cardioversion. One month after cardioversion up to 68% of patients had a recurrence of persistent AF. During the first 3 days almost no recurrences were seen on beta-blocker therapy whereas recurrences peaked on day 2-3 in the absence of beta-blockers. Univariate analysis showed that the use of beta-adrenergic receptor blockers and the presence of hypertension were associated with a lower recurrence rate at 1 month. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that beta-blockade was the only statistically significant parameter predicting sinus rhythm at 1 month (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.86, P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with lone AF patients, patients in the setting of hypertension maintain sinus rhythm much better after cardioversion when treated with a beta-blocker. Beta-blockade protects, in particular, against the early subacute recurrences. These findings underscore the importance of a differential approach towards drug prevention of post-cardioversion recurrences depending on the underlying heart disease.
METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients were included after successful cardioversion of persistent AF. None of the patients was given a class I or III antiarrhythmic drug. Patients' heart rhythm was checked 3 times a day, using transtelephonic monitoring for 1 month after cardioversion. One month after cardioversion up to 68% of patients had a recurrence of persistent AF. During the first 3 days almost no recurrences were seen on beta-blocker therapy whereas recurrences peaked on day 2-3 in the absence of beta-blockers. Univariate analysis showed that the use of beta-adrenergic receptor blockers and the presence of hypertension were associated with a lower recurrence rate at 1 month. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that beta-blockade was the only statistically significant parameter predicting sinus rhythm at 1 month (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.86, P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with lone AF patients, patients in the setting of hypertension maintain sinus rhythm much better after cardioversion when treated with a beta-blocker. Beta-blockade protects, in particular, against the early subacute recurrences. These findings underscore the importance of a differential approach towards drug prevention of post-cardioversion recurrences depending on the underlying heart disease.