MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1597/03-045.1

Медицинская библиотека · The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2005

Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting: a survey of ACPA teams.

Murthy Ananth S, Lehman James A

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the management of alveolar clefts by cleft palate and craniofacial teams in North America.

DESIGN

An anonymous survey was mailed to 240 American Cleft Palate- Craniofacial Association teams across North America regarding alveolar bone grafting. The questionnaire included multiple questions about each team's approach to alveolar bone grafting and options for the missing tooth.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved in three areas: 90% of centers performed secondary alveolar bone grafting, 78% performed grafting between ages 6 and 9 years, and iliac crest donor site was the most popular site (83%). There was no consensus with respect to dental criteria for the timing of grafting, follow-up x-rays, or the use of a grading system for evaluating results. In addition, there was no consensus on the management of the missing tooth.

CONCLUSION

There is wide acceptance of secondary bone grafting and there is a consensus for the age of grafting (6 to 9 years) and donor site (iliac crest). The disturbing finding was the lack of postoperative x-ray evaluation of the results. With so much variability in management, the use of a routine, standardized scale to measure postoperative results would allow for better outcome studies in alveolar bone grafting.

Для цитирования: Murthy Ananth S, Lehman James A. Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting: a survey of ACPA teams.. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2005. DOI: 10.1597/03-045.1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.