DOI 10.1007/s00247-025-06199-1
Qualitative evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging features in aneurysmal bone cysts after percutaneous cryoablation.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) are benign vascular lesions commonly affecting the pediatric population.
OBJECTIVE
To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ABCs after percutaneous cryoablation.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A retrospective review of the hospital's electronic medical record database was conducted to identify patients who underwent percutaneous image-guided cryoablation for aneurysmal bone cysts between March 2014 and April 2024. Patients were excluded if they lacked pre- or post-treatment MRI, underwent surgical curettage and bone grafting between cryoablation treatments, or received adjunctive therapies such as sclerotherapy or bone grafting. Demographic data and pre- and post-cryoablation MRI characteristics of the lesions were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients (mean age = 14.6 years). The average ABC volume decreased from 83 cm3 pre-treatment to 32.7 cm3 post-treatment. In the final post-treatment MRI, there was a 50% decrease in the cystic component in 90% (n = 18) of patients, improved cortical integrity in 75% (n = 9), resolution of peri-lesional edema and mass effect in all (n = 20), and development of organized fibrosis in 50% (n = 10) of the patients. The average time was 8.3 months for a 50% reduction in cystic component, 7.3 months for improvement in cortical integrity, 6.4 months for improvement in mass effect, 15 months for complete resolution of peri-lesional enhancement, and 16.1 months for the development of organized fibrosis.
CONCLUSION
These findings suggest MRI is a valuable tool for monitoring ABC response to cryotherapy, guiding future treatment protocols.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.