BMC psychiatry · 2025
Psychosocial adversity and executive functions in children and adolescents: a systematic review of mediating and moderating influences of parenting behaviors.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cardoso Andressa Souza, Martins Rafaela Costa, Venturin Bruna, Gonzalez Andrea, Blumenberg Cauane, Murray Joseph
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Summarize the state of the evidence on potential mediating and moderating roles of parenting behaviors in the relationship between psychosocial adversity and executive functions among children and adolescents.
METHOD: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO databases in June 2024, screening for eligible studies, in duplicate, and summarizing results from individual studies.
RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible studies were identified, 18 from the USA and Canada, and 3 from other countries. In 17 studies of mediation, developmentally supportive parenting behaviors and non-supportive parenting behaviors at least partly explained the relationship between adversity (low socioeconomic status, household chaos, intimate partner violence, and maternal depression) and executive functions. Among four studies testing moderation, two suggested that a context of developmentally supportive parenting behaviors (e.g., maternal sensitivity) may act as a protective factor, buffering the negative effects of adversity (low socioeconomic status) on executive functions.
CONCLUSION: Parenting practices are potentially important intervening mechanisms explaining the effects of adversity on child executive functions, and developmentally supportive parenting behaviors could mitigate negative effects. However, the current evidence base is limited, particularly about potential buffering effects, and further research is needed across a wider range of countries and settings.
METHOD: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO databases in June 2024, screening for eligible studies, in duplicate, and summarizing results from individual studies.
RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible studies were identified, 18 from the USA and Canada, and 3 from other countries. In 17 studies of mediation, developmentally supportive parenting behaviors and non-supportive parenting behaviors at least partly explained the relationship between adversity (low socioeconomic status, household chaos, intimate partner violence, and maternal depression) and executive functions. Among four studies testing moderation, two suggested that a context of developmentally supportive parenting behaviors (e.g., maternal sensitivity) may act as a protective factor, buffering the negative effects of adversity (low socioeconomic status) on executive functions.
CONCLUSION: Parenting practices are potentially important intervening mechanisms explaining the effects of adversity on child executive functions, and developmentally supportive parenting behaviors could mitigate negative effects. However, the current evidence base is limited, particularly about potential buffering effects, and further research is needed across a wider range of countries and settings.