MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10899-012-9354-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gambling studies · 2014

Validating the gambling functional assessment--revised in a United kingdom sample.

Weatherly Jeffrey N, Dymond Simon, Samuels Lotte, Austin Jennifer L, Terrell Heather K

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The gambling functional assessment-revised (GFA-R) was designed to assess whether the respondent's gambling was maintained by positive reinforcement or escape. The present study attempted to validate the GFA-R's psychometric properties using United Kingdom (UK) university students and to compare the results to those from a sample of American university students. Two hundred seventy four UK students completed the GFA-R, and 153 also completed the South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS). Two hundred one United States (US) university students completed both measures. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original model of the GFA-R provided an excellent fit for the UK data and internal consistency was high. These outcomes were similar, if not superior, to those from the US sample. SOGS scores strongly correlated with GFA-R escape subscale scores in both samples, replicating previous results. These findings indicate that the GFA-R is a valid measure for use in the UK, which is potentially useful to both practitioners and researchers. They also suggest that the strong relationship between endorsing gambling as an escape and measures of disordered gambling may be ubiquitous.

Для цитирования: Weatherly Jeffrey N, Dymond Simon, Samuels Lotte, Austin Jennifer L, Terrell Heather K. Validating the gambling functional assessment--revised in a United kingdom sample.. Journal of gambling studies. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-012-9354-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.