MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0378-6323.60566

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology · 2010

Prevalence of different Malassezia species in pityriasis versicolor in central India.

Chaudhary Rahul, Singh Sanjay, Banerjee Tuhina, Tilak Ragini

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In the last 10 years, different studies have shown interesting geographical variations in the prevalence of different Malassezia species in pityriasis versicolor.

AIM: Identification of Malassezia species isolated from patients with pityriasis versicolor.

METHODS

In 100 patients with pityriasis versicolor, Malassezia species were identified by culture in Sabouraud's dextrose agar containing cycloheximide with olive oil overlay and modified Dixon agar and by doing biochemical tests (catalase reaction, assimilation of glycine, and Tween utilisation tests).

RESULTS

In 10 patients, 10% KOH smear was negative, while in 90 patients the smear showed characteristic "spaghetti and meatball" appearance. Of these 90 cases, growth was obtained on modified Dixon's agar in 87 cases. Fifty of the isolates (57.5%) were M. globosa, 15 (17.2%) were M. sympodialis, seven (8.0%) were suspected M. sympodialis, 6 (6.9%) each of the isolates were M. furfur and M. obtusa, and three (3.4%) isolates were M. restricta.

CONCLUSION

M. globosa was the most common species, followed by M. sympodialis, M. furfur, M. obtusa, and M. restricta.

Для цитирования: Chaudhary Rahul, Singh Sanjay, Banerjee Tuhina, Tilak Ragini. Prevalence of different Malassezia species in pityriasis versicolor in central India.. Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology. 2010. DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.60566.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.