MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archotol.124.2.177

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery · 1998

Results of tympanoplasty in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia.

Denoyelle F, Roger G, Ducroz V, Escudier E, Fauroux B, Garabedian E N

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of tympanoplasty in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia complicated by tympanic perforation or cholesteatoma with hearing loss and/or recurrent otorrhea.

DESIGN

Retrospective study. Postoperative follow-up of 26.3 months in the type 1 tympanoplasty group and 46 months in the child with cholesteatoma.

SETTING

Hospitalized care, referral center.

PATIENTS: Seven children with primary ciliary dyskinesia, complicated in 6 children by 9 tympanic perforations (3 bilateral perforations) and in 1 child by an attical cholesteatoma.

RESULTS

After 9 type 1 tympanoplasties, the grafts were intact in 9 ears, with no recurrence of otorrhea, but serous otitis media was present in 6 of the 9 ears. Auditory improvement was significant, with an average gain of 17-dB hearing level in speech frequencies. After a canal wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for attic cholesteatoma in 1 ear, the cavity that was operated on showed no signs of otorrhea or residual cholesteatoma after a follow-up of 46 months.

CONCLUSION

In children with primary ciliary dyskinesia, tympanoplasty has a high probability of graft success and auditory improvement, despite the frequent recurrence of serous otitis media.

Для цитирования: Denoyelle F, Roger G, Ducroz V, Escudier E, Fauroux B, Garabedian E N. Results of tympanoplasty in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia.. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.124.2.177.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.