MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4040/jkan.2006.36.8.1315

Медицинская библиотека · Taehan Kanho Hakhoe chi · 2006

Discriminative factor analysis of juvenile delinquency in South Korea.

Kim Hyun Sil, Kim Hun Soo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The present study was intended to compare difference in research variables between delinquent adolescents and student adolescents, and to analyze discriminative factors of delinquent behaviors among Korean adolescents.

METHODS

The research design of this study was a questionnaire survey. Questionnaires were administered to 2,167 adolescents (1,196 students and 971 delinquents), sampled from 8 middle and high school and 6 juvenile corrective institutions, using the proportional stratified random sampling method. Statistical methods employed were Chi-square, t-test, and logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The discriminative factors of delinquent behaviors were smoking, alcohol use, other drug use, being sexually abused, viewing time of media violence and pornography. Among these discriminative factors, the factor most strongly associated with delinquency was smoking (odds ratio: 32.32). That is, smoking adolescent has a 32-fold higher possibility of becoming a delinquent adolescent than a non-smoking adolescent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings, that smoking was the strongest discriminative factor of delinquent behavior, suggest that educational strategies to prevent adolescent smoking may reduce the rate of juvenile delinquency. Antismoking educational efforts are therefore urgently needed in South Korea.

Для цитирования: Kim Hyun Sil, Kim Hun Soo. Discriminative factor analysis of juvenile delinquency in South Korea.. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe chi. 2006. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2006.36.8.1315.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.