Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2021
Histopathologic Analysis of Temporal Bones With Otosclerosis Following Cochlear Implantation.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hodge Sarah E, Ishiyama Gail, Lopez Ivan A, Ishiyama Akira
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Analyze changes in osteoneogenesis and fibrosis following cochlear implant (CI) surgery in patients with otosclerosis and compare differences based on insertion technique.
BACKGROUND: When advanced otosclerotic disease extends to the otic capsule, severe and profound sensorineural hearing loss necessitates consideration of a cochlear implant. Histopathological analysis of the human temporal bone after implantation in the patient with otosclerosis may reveal important variables that predict CI success.
METHODS: Histopathological evaluation of archival human temporal bones from subjects with a history of CI for cochlear otosclerosis. A total of 17 human temporal bones (HTB) were analyzed, 13 implanted, and 4 contralateral non-implanted controls.
RESULTS: Histopathological studies revealed extensive osteoneogenesis and fibrosis which was more prominent at the cochleostomy insertion site in the basal turn of the cochlea often obliterating the scala tympani in the basal turn, and in some cases extending to the scala media and scala vestibuli. Cochlear hydrops was nearly universal in these cases. This contrasted with the round window insertion, which exhibited minimal osteoneogenesis within the cochlear duct. In addition, in the contralateral, unimplanted control ears, there was otosclerosis at the stapes footplate, fissula ante fenestrum but no osteoneogenesis within the cochlear duct.
CONCLUSION: Cochleostomy approach to CI insertion in otosclerosis patients is associated with significant fibrosis, osteoneogenesis, and cochlear hydrops. A round window insertion technique can be utilized to help minimize these histopathologic findings whenever feasible.
BACKGROUND: When advanced otosclerotic disease extends to the otic capsule, severe and profound sensorineural hearing loss necessitates consideration of a cochlear implant. Histopathological analysis of the human temporal bone after implantation in the patient with otosclerosis may reveal important variables that predict CI success.
METHODS: Histopathological evaluation of archival human temporal bones from subjects with a history of CI for cochlear otosclerosis. A total of 17 human temporal bones (HTB) were analyzed, 13 implanted, and 4 contralateral non-implanted controls.
RESULTS: Histopathological studies revealed extensive osteoneogenesis and fibrosis which was more prominent at the cochleostomy insertion site in the basal turn of the cochlea often obliterating the scala tympani in the basal turn, and in some cases extending to the scala media and scala vestibuli. Cochlear hydrops was nearly universal in these cases. This contrasted with the round window insertion, which exhibited minimal osteoneogenesis within the cochlear duct. In addition, in the contralateral, unimplanted control ears, there was otosclerosis at the stapes footplate, fissula ante fenestrum but no osteoneogenesis within the cochlear duct.
CONCLUSION: Cochleostomy approach to CI insertion in otosclerosis patients is associated with significant fibrosis, osteoneogenesis, and cochlear hydrops. A round window insertion technique can be utilized to help minimize these histopathologic findings whenever feasible.