A randomized comparison of energy consumption when using different canes, inpatients after stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the differences in oxygen consumption associated with gait in hemiplegic patients according to the type of cane they use.

DESIGN

A randomized crossover design.

SETTING

University hospital-based rehabilitation center, Korea.

SUBJECTS: Thirty consecutive patients (mean ± SD age, 56.3 ± 3.2 years) with chronic stroke, 17 (56.7%) males and 13 (43.3%) females.

INTERVENTIONS: At approximately the same time of day for three consecutive days, each participant completed a walk with one of three randomly assigned types of canes: a single-point cane, a quad cane, and a hemi-walker.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Energy expenditure (O2 rate, mL/kg/min), energy cost (O2 cost, mL/kg/m), and heart rate (HR) via a portable gas analyzer, a 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and a 6-minute walk test (6MWT).

RESULTS

Energy expenditure, gait endurance, and gait velocity for a single-point cane were higher (p<0.001 or p=0.005) than for any other type of cane. Energy cost (0.5 ± 0.2 mL/kg/m vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 mL/kg/m vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 ml/kg/m, respectively, p=0.001) was lower for the single-point cane, except for HR (p ≥ 0.05) after the Bonferroni correction (0.05/5=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A single-point cane requires less oxygen use at a given speed, or permits greater speed for the same oxygen consumption.