DOI 10.1097/jgp.0b013e318190b8d8
Patterns of mild cognitive impairment after treatment of depression in the elderly.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Late-life depression (LLD) is associated with persistent cognitive impairment in a subset of individuals. The purpose of this study was to 1) examine the frequency and characteristics of cognitive diagnoses (Mild Cognitive Impairment [MCI], dementia) among remitted elderly depressed subjects and 2) to compare the prevalence rate and correlates of cognitive diagnoses with those of comparison subjects.
DESIGN
Crosssectional.
SETTING
Outpatient geriatric mental health clinic.
PARTICIPANTS
The authors examined cognitive diagnoses among 109 subjects age 65 and older, after depression treatment response and 65 never-depressed, age- and education-equated comparison subjects.
MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive diagnoses were independently established by the University of Pittsburgh's Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the role of specific risk factors for cognitive diagnosis among depressed subjects.
RESULTS
Relative to comparison subjects, nearly twice as many depressed subjects were diagnosed with MCI or dementia (48% versus 28%). Of the 109 depressed subjects, 38% were diagnosed with MCI (63% amnestic, 37% nonamnestic). The majority of amnestic MCI subjects (85%) had the multiple domain subtype. Age, but not age of onset or lifetime depression duration, predicted cognitive diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite adequate depression treatment response, 48% of remitted depressed subjects had a cognitive diagnosis. Of the 38% diagnosed with MCI, there was high representation among both the amnestic and the nonamnestic subtypes, suggesting heterogeneity in cognitive course and outcomes in LLD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.