Characterization of direct and indirect cerebral revascularization for the treatment of European patients with moyamoya disease.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The best revascularization strategy for moyamoya disease (MMD) remains unknown. Our aim was to characterize angiographic revascularization effects of a bilateral standardized revascularization approach, consisting of superficial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass and encephalomyosynangiosis (EMS) on one hemisphere and single EMS on the contralateral hemisphere of each patient, and to compare the effects of both revascularization strategies on cerebral hemodynamics.
METHODS
In 30 patients (18 females/12 males, age 8-63 years), standardized revascularization was performed. Digital subtraction angiography was performed preoperatively and at 7 days, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. STA-MCA and EMS functions were graded I (poor), II (medium) or III (extensive) according to angiographic aspects. In 20 patients, cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CVRC) was assessed pre- and postoperatively (at 12 months) using xenon CT.
RESULTS
After 12 months, STA-MCA/EMS function was grade 1 in 40/40%, grade 2 in 27/26%, and grade 3 in 27/10% of hemispheres, respectively. Twelve months after surgery, single EMS showed grade I in 37%, grade II in 27%, and grade III in 20% of hemispheres. Combined revascularization improved CVRC significantly compared to preoperative measurement (preoperative: 16.5 ± 34.6% vs. postoperative: 60.8 ± 64.22%; p < 0.05). Single EMS did not improve CVRC significantly (preoperative: 21.8 ± 35.9% vs. postoperative: 34.8 ± 63.0%; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Combined and indirect revascularization may be successfully applied in a bilateral standardized approach. STA-MCA/EMS is superior to single EMS in restoring CVRC in adult MMD patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.