Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 1985
Use of dose-response data to compare the skin sensitizing abilities of dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate and picryl chloride in two animal species.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stadler J C, Karol M H
Аннотация
Groups of English smooth-haired guinea pigs and BALB/cBy mice were exposed to dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (HMDI) and picryl chloride (PiCl) by topical exposure. Guinea pigs were challenged 7 days later by patch testing and responses graded at 24 hr. Application of high doses of each chemical resulted in extensive erythema and a large proportion of animals became sensitized. Lower doses produced less sensitivity. In mice, sensitivity was assessed by extent of ear swelling upon challenge 5 days following the sensitization exposure. In mice, as well as in guinea pigs, a dose-response relationship was apparent between the sensitizing dose and both severity of response and number of animals responding. For mice, comparison of the dose of chemical required to sensitize 50% of the animals (SD50) yielded 0.40 mg/kg for PiCl and approximately 0.20 mg/kg for HMDI. Use of the SD50 should provide a method for assessing the ability of various chemicals to cause contact sensitivity.