Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025
Gut microbiome differences in Parkinson's disease patients in Central Kerala population.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jacob Anjali Anne, Rout Sudeshna, Dash Rishikesh, Venugopal Giriprasad, Punde Ankita Ramdass, John John K, Varghese Saritha Susan, Cherupanakkal Cleetus, Mattethra George Chandy, Ramadass Balamurugan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gut microbiota dysbiosis is increasingly implicated in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to find gut microbiota diversity and composition of PD patients in Central Kerala population, India.
METHODS: 16 PD patients were enrolled and their spouse formed the controls. Fecal Microbiome analysis was performed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
RESULTS: Seven microbial species significantly contributed to the differences in beta diversity between the PD and control groups (p = 0.007). On network analysis Bifidobacterium longum, Bacteroides fragilis, Blautia obeum and Roseburia faecis represented the PD group communities and Ruminococcus bromii and Ruminococcus gnavus represented the controls. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Ruminococcus gnavus enhanced centrality in the spouse control network and Bifidobacterium longum, Eubacterium biforme, and Roseburia faecis in PD group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study offers initial evidence for identifying PD associated gut microbiome alterations in the Kerala population to be further explored with larger and more detailed longitudinal study.
METHODS: 16 PD patients were enrolled and their spouse formed the controls. Fecal Microbiome analysis was performed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
RESULTS: Seven microbial species significantly contributed to the differences in beta diversity between the PD and control groups (p = 0.007). On network analysis Bifidobacterium longum, Bacteroides fragilis, Blautia obeum and Roseburia faecis represented the PD group communities and Ruminococcus bromii and Ruminococcus gnavus represented the controls. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Ruminococcus gnavus enhanced centrality in the spouse control network and Bifidobacterium longum, Eubacterium biforme, and Roseburia faecis in PD group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study offers initial evidence for identifying PD associated gut microbiome alterations in the Kerala population to be further explored with larger and more detailed longitudinal study.