MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10350-003-0013-x

Медицинская библиотека · Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2004

Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria.

Brown A J, Anderson J H, McKee R F, Finlay I G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Reports of outcome after surgery for rectal prolapse predominantly relate to single operative procedures. A single surgical operation is not appropriate for all patients with rectal prolapse. We describe a selective policy based on clinical criteria.

METHODS

Patients were offered surgery according to the following broad clinical protocol. Those who were unfit for abdominal surgery had a perineal operation. The remainder had a suture abdominal rectopexy. A sigmoid resection was added for patients in whom incontinence was not a predominant symptom.

RESULTS

Surgery was performed in 159 patients. Of these, 57 had a perineal operation, 65 had fixation rectopexy, and 37 had resection rectopexy. There were no in-hospital deaths, and major complications occurred in five patients (3.5 percent). Minimum follow-up was 3 years. Of the 143 patients with long-term follow-up, recurrence occurred in 7 (5 percent). Constipation increased from 41 to 43 percent (59-61/143) and incontinence decreased from 43 to 19 percent (61 to 27/143).

CONCLUSIONS

A selective policy has improved outcome compared with reports of a single operation. Future studies might consider an objective method of selecting the type of operation for rectal prolapse.

Для цитирования: Brown A J, Anderson J H, McKee R F, Finlay I G. Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria.. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-003-0013-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.