MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09273972.2024.2410817

Медицинская библиотека · Strabismus · 2024

Science mapping and research trends of strabismus: a Scientometric analysis.

Haseli-Mofrad Azadeh, Rajavi Zhale, Sabbaghi Hamideh, Khosravi Mirzaei Sina

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Aim: To draw and analyze a science map and research trends in the field of strabismus with the method of co-word analysis. Method: In this Scientometric study, all scientific outputs in the field of strabismus indexing in the Scopus database between 2005 and 2023 have been analyzed based on various Scientometric indicators. Data analysis was conducted using Excel and VOSviewer softwares.

Results

The most significant growth in scientific output occurred in 2021, while the lowest was observed in 2023. The field of strabismus classified in four subject clusters, including Strabismus and Neurology, Alignment Disorders, Visual Acuity/Refraction and Strabismus, and Binocular Vision and Strabismus. Research pertaining to Genetics and Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) have notably emerged between 2014 and 2018, reflecting a trend toward increased research focus in these areas.

Conclusion

The growth of graph scientific output in strabismus shows periodic fluctuations across various years, with its pick in 2021 and the lowest point in 2023 due to spread of COVID-19. Strabismus and neurology cluster had the highest frequently especially in the USA. Genetic and BCVA as emerging topics were frequently studied in recent years due to extensive progress of genetic science.

Для цитирования: Haseli-Mofrad Azadeh, Rajavi Zhale, Sabbaghi Hamideh, Khosravi Mirzaei Sina. Science mapping and research trends of strabismus: a Scientometric analysis.. Strabismus. 2024. DOI: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2410817.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.