MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/bul0000300

Медицинская библиотека · Psychological bulletin · 2020

Personality, attitude, and demographic correlates of academic dishonesty: A meta-analysis.

Lee Samuel D, Kuncel Nathan R, Gau Jacob

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Over a century of research has focused on the relationship between student characteristics and academic dishonesty. Here we conduct a meta-analysis of this extensive literature across three broad domains: personality, academic attitudes, and historical information including demographic and prior accomplishments. After analyzing correlations from over 27,000 participants across 75 samples, several relationships stand out. Although measures of conscientiousness (ρ¯ = -.25) and agreeableness (ρ¯ = -.13) from the popular five-factor model demonstrate important relationships with dishonesty, equal or greater effects were found for specific personality scales including impulsivity (ρ¯ = .39) and psychopathy (ρ¯ = .40). Both morality (ρ¯ = -.24) and academic self-efficacy (ρ¯ = -.28) were related to less dishonest behavior but demonstrated substantially smaller effects than measures of neutralization (ρ¯ = .43), a tendency to justify and deflect immoral behavior as reasonable given the circumstances. Hypotheses were developed and results are framed by two competing models of academic dishonesty. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Для цитирования: Lee Samuel D, Kuncel Nathan R, Gau Jacob. Personality, attitude, and demographic correlates of academic dishonesty: A meta-analysis.. Psychological bulletin. 2020. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000300.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.