MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.049

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of emergency medicine · 2019

Concordance between blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures in meningitis.

Phillips Ryan J, Watanabe Kyle M, Stowell Jeffrey R, Akhter Murtaza

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures and blood cultures in patients with suspected bacterial or fungal meningitis.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective chart review, conducted from April 2012 to January 2017 of consecutive patient encounters with bacterial or fungal organism growth in CSF culture, when a blood culture was also obtained. Patients were excluded if they received antibiotics prior to either lumbar puncture (LP) or blood culture acquisition, or if CSF cultures were positive for common bacterial skin contaminants. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the dataset.

RESULTS

21 patient encounters met study inclusion criteria. 13 (61.9%; 95% CI 40.2-80.5%) had blood culture growth of the same organism as the CSF culture. 1 patient had a different organism in the blood culture compared to the CSF culture. 6 patients (33.3%, 95% CI 14.8%-56.9%) with positive CSF cultures had negative blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest an insufficient degree of agreement between CSF and blood culture results. PCR may be a prudent approach in patients requiring immediate antibiotics and delayed LP.

Для цитирования: Phillips Ryan J, Watanabe Kyle M, Stowell Jeffrey R, Akhter Murtaza. Concordance between blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures in meningitis.. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.