Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023
Peripheral artery disease causes consistent gait irregularities regardless of the location of leg claudication pain.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rahman Hafizur, Leutzinger Todd, Hassan Mahdi, Schieber Molly, Koutakis Panagiotis, Fuglestad Matthew A, DeSpiegelaere Holly, Longo G Matthew, Malcolm Philippe, Johanning Jason M, Casale George P, Pipinos Iraklis I, Myers Sara A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The most common symptom of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is intermittent claudication that involves the calf, thigh, and/or buttock muscles. How the specific location of this leg pain is related to altered gait, however, is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that because the location of claudication symptoms uniquely affects different leg muscle groups in people with PAD, this would produce distinctive walking patterns.
METHODS: A total of 105 participants with PAD and 35 age-matched older volunteers without PAD (CTRL) were recruited. Participants completed walking impairment questionnaires (WIQ), Gardner-Skinner progressive treadmill tests, the six-minute walk test, and we performed an advanced evaluation of the biomechanics of their overground walking. Participants with PAD were categorized into 4 groups according to their stated pain location(s): calf only (C, n = 43); thigh and calf (TC, n = 18); buttock and calf (BC, n = 15); or buttock, thigh, and calf (BTC, n = 29). Outcomes were compared between CTRL, C, TC, BC and BTC groups using a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons to identify and assess statistically significant differences.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between CTRL, C, TC, BC and BTC groups in distances walked or walking speed when either pain-free or experiencing claudication pain. Each participant with PAD had significantly dysfunctional biomechanical gait parameters, even when pain-free, when compared to CTRL (pain-free) walking data. During pain-free walking, out of the 18 gait parameters evaluated, we only identified significant differences in hip power generation during push-off (in C and TC groups) and in knee power absorption during weight acceptance (in TC and BC groups). There were no between-group differences in gait parameters while people with PAD were walking with claudication pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that PAD affects the ischemic lower extremities in a diffuse manner irrespective of the location of claudication symptoms.
DATABASE REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01970332.
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that because the location of claudication symptoms uniquely affects different leg muscle groups in people with PAD, this would produce distinctive walking patterns.
METHODS: A total of 105 participants with PAD and 35 age-matched older volunteers without PAD (CTRL) were recruited. Participants completed walking impairment questionnaires (WIQ), Gardner-Skinner progressive treadmill tests, the six-minute walk test, and we performed an advanced evaluation of the biomechanics of their overground walking. Participants with PAD were categorized into 4 groups according to their stated pain location(s): calf only (C, n = 43); thigh and calf (TC, n = 18); buttock and calf (BC, n = 15); or buttock, thigh, and calf (BTC, n = 29). Outcomes were compared between CTRL, C, TC, BC and BTC groups using a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparisons to identify and assess statistically significant differences.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between CTRL, C, TC, BC and BTC groups in distances walked or walking speed when either pain-free or experiencing claudication pain. Each participant with PAD had significantly dysfunctional biomechanical gait parameters, even when pain-free, when compared to CTRL (pain-free) walking data. During pain-free walking, out of the 18 gait parameters evaluated, we only identified significant differences in hip power generation during push-off (in C and TC groups) and in knee power absorption during weight acceptance (in TC and BC groups). There were no between-group differences in gait parameters while people with PAD were walking with claudication pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that PAD affects the ischemic lower extremities in a diffuse manner irrespective of the location of claudication symptoms.
DATABASE REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01970332.