MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.007

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical biochemistry · 2012

Improving serological test ordering patterns for the diagnosis of celiac disease through clinical laboratory audit of practice.

Huang Yun, Don-Wauchope Andrew C, Grey Vijay L, Mansour Maged, Brill Herbert, Armstrong David

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) from both adult medicine and pediatrics recommend tTG to screen for celiac disease (CD).

DESIGN AND

METHODS

Serological test orders for celiac disease were evaluated against the guidelines. Ordering physicians were categorized as gastroenterologists, immunologists, pediatricians, other hospital physicians and non-hospital physicians. Interventions based on initial audit were implemented, including interacting with physicians, revising test menu and changing test ordering policy. After implementation of interventions, test orders were re-evaluated.

RESULTS

After corrective interventions celiac panel (CP) orders were decreased from 48.4% to 3.6% in children, and from 72.3% to 28.1% in adults. Physicians ordered tTG alone for more than 90% of children. In adults the ordering of tTG alone was significantly increased from 7.2% to 61.3% (from 8.9% to 63.9% for gastroenterologists and from 8.1% to 44.4% for other physicians (p<0.05)).

CONCLUSIONS

The audit reduced the CPG-practice gap that existed in the screening of CD.

Для цитирования: Huang Yun, Don-Wauchope Andrew C, Grey Vijay L, Mansour Maged, Brill Herbert, Armstrong David. Improving serological test ordering patterns for the diagnosis of celiac disease through clinical laboratory audit of practice.. Clinical biochemistry. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.01.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.