International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2011
Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary molars class I and II restorations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Franca Carolina, Colares Viviane, Van Amerongen Evert
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) has the advantages of reducing pain and fear and of being more cost-effective than the traditional approach.
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of ART class I and II restorations in primary molars at 2 years.
DESIGN: The sample consisted of 190 restorations and placed in 155 children 6-7 years old of both genders. The treatment was performed by two final-year dental students. All patients were treated in a completely supine position on tables available in the schools. The restorations were evaluated at 1, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: The best results were found for class I in each period of follow-up. After 1 month, the success of class I restorations was 94.6% and class II restorations 70.1%. After 12 months, the success rate was 50.6% for class I and 15.2% for class II. The most frequent failure characteristics were totally or partially lost and gross marginal defect.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of success of restorations using the ART approach was significantly lower for class II.
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of ART class I and II restorations in primary molars at 2 years.
DESIGN: The sample consisted of 190 restorations and placed in 155 children 6-7 years old of both genders. The treatment was performed by two final-year dental students. All patients were treated in a completely supine position on tables available in the schools. The restorations were evaluated at 1, 12, and 24 months.
RESULTS: The best results were found for class I in each period of follow-up. After 1 month, the success of class I restorations was 94.6% and class II restorations 70.1%. After 12 months, the success rate was 50.6% for class I and 15.2% for class II. The most frequent failure characteristics were totally or partially lost and gross marginal defect.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of success of restorations using the ART approach was significantly lower for class II.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
ChildDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentDental CariesDental Cavity PreparationDental Marginal AdaptationDental Restoration FailureDental Restoration, PermanentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlass Ionomer CementsHumansMaleMolarPulpitisRecurrenceSurface PropertiesSurvival AnalysisTooth, DeciduousTreatment Outcome