European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
Endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted and open approaches in the treatment of juvenile angiofibroma: what has been new in the past decade (and 1586 cases)?
Систематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jurlina Martin, Pupić-Bakrač Jure, Pupić-Bakrač Ana
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Juvenile angiofibroma (JA) is a benign, but locally invasive tumor of the nasopharynx. Surgical resection of JA is performed through endoscopic (EA), endoscopic-assisted (EAA), or open approaches (OA). The management of these tumors is constantly evolving. We aimed to compare the surgical efficiency and morbidity of EA, EAA, and OA in JA treatment by conducting a systematic review of the literature published over the last 10 years.
METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature on surgical cases of JA published between 2012 and 2022 was performed. Eligible articles were analyzed for individual patient data (IPD) and aggregate patient data (APD). The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach. The primary outcome variable was recurrence rate.
RESULTS: The search retrieved 75 articles reporting 1586 JA surgical cases; 129 in IPD, and 1457 in APD data sets. Within the IPD data set, recurrence rates were significantly lower in cases completed by EA than that by OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the EA and EAA groups (p > 0.05). EAA had a lower recurrence rate than that of OA (p < 0.05). For the APD data set, the recurrence rate following EA was significantly lower than that following OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence between the EA and EAA groups (p > 0.05), and between the EAA and OA groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: EA represents the method of choice for mild and moderately advanced JA. EAA and OA still play important roles in the treatment of advanced-stage JA.
METHODS: A systematic review of the English literature on surgical cases of JA published between 2012 and 2022 was performed. Eligible articles were analyzed for individual patient data (IPD) and aggregate patient data (APD). The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach. The primary outcome variable was recurrence rate.
RESULTS: The search retrieved 75 articles reporting 1586 JA surgical cases; 129 in IPD, and 1457 in APD data sets. Within the IPD data set, recurrence rates were significantly lower in cases completed by EA than that by OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the EA and EAA groups (p > 0.05). EAA had a lower recurrence rate than that of OA (p < 0.05). For the APD data set, the recurrence rate following EA was significantly lower than that following OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in recurrence between the EA and EAA groups (p > 0.05), and between the EAA and OA groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: EA represents the method of choice for mild and moderately advanced JA. EAA and OA still play important roles in the treatment of advanced-stage JA.