Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985) · 2003
Comparison between balanced occlusion and canine guidance in complete denture wearers--a clinical, randomized trial.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peroz Ingrid, Leuenberg Ariane, Haustein Ingrun, Lange Klaus-Peter
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Two occlusal concepts exist for the setup of complete dentures: canine guidance and balanced occlusion. These two schemes were studied in a randomized clinical trial of 22 patients.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: Subjective data were collected using a visual analog scale that described the patients' satisfaction with the esthetic appearance, the ability to chew, the ability to speak, and denture retention. Objective data were collected on the number of denture ulcers, the number of occlusal contacts, and denture retention during eccentric movements. Statistic evaluation was performed with the Friedman test.
RESULTS: Patients assessed canine-guided dentures to be significantly more satisfying in esthetic appearance, mandibular denture retention, and chewing ability. The ability to speak and the retention of maxillary dentures were not influenced by the occlusal concept in the patients' opinion, whereas the examiners found that maxillary canine-guided dentures lost retention more frequently during eccentric movements than balanced dentures. The objective inspection of mandibular denture retention underscores the patients' assessment, showing that the mandibular canine-guided dentures are much more stable during laterotrusive and protrusive movements.
CONCLUSION: Canine guidance can be used successfully in complete denture treatment as it provides better mandibular denture retention, esthetic appearance, and chewing ability.
METHOD AND MATERIALS: Subjective data were collected using a visual analog scale that described the patients' satisfaction with the esthetic appearance, the ability to chew, the ability to speak, and denture retention. Objective data were collected on the number of denture ulcers, the number of occlusal contacts, and denture retention during eccentric movements. Statistic evaluation was performed with the Friedman test.
RESULTS: Patients assessed canine-guided dentures to be significantly more satisfying in esthetic appearance, mandibular denture retention, and chewing ability. The ability to speak and the retention of maxillary dentures were not influenced by the occlusal concept in the patients' opinion, whereas the examiners found that maxillary canine-guided dentures lost retention more frequently during eccentric movements than balanced dentures. The objective inspection of mandibular denture retention underscores the patients' assessment, showing that the mandibular canine-guided dentures are much more stable during laterotrusive and protrusive movements.
CONCLUSION: Canine guidance can be used successfully in complete denture treatment as it provides better mandibular denture retention, esthetic appearance, and chewing ability.