The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2020
Preoperative Factors That Predict Recurrence After Repair of Discrete Subaortic Stenosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carlson Laura, Pickard Sarah, Gauvreau Kimberlee, Baird Christopher, Geva Tal, Del Nido Pedro, Nathan Meena
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Several factors predict reintervention for subaortic stenosis (SubAS): age, preoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradient, distance from the obstructive subaortic ridge to the aortic valve, and peeling of membrane from the aortic/mitral valves. We sought to develop a prediction rule to categorize risk of reintervention for recurrent SubAS and guide follow-up in patients with discrete SubAS.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent SubAS resection between 1984 and 2016. Our primary outcome was reintervention for recurrent SubAS after discharge. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for time-to-event analysis of any reintervention. Multivariable models were used to create a prediction rule. We excluded patients without 3 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 21 (12.2%) required reintervention. The characteristics predicting reintervention were age younger than 2 years (P < .001), preoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradient of 65 mm Hg or more (P = .011), peeling of membrane from the mitral valve (P < .001), distance from the membrane to the aortic valve of less than 5 mm (P < .001), prior complex operation (P = .035), other left-sided heart lesions (P = .008), and aortic annulus z-score of -2.5 or less (P < .001). Our final prediction rule includes age, membrane to aortic valve distance, and other left-sided heart lesions each scored as 1 point. For patients with a score of 1 or less, 4% required a reintervention compared with 34% with a score of 2 or more.
CONCLUSIONS: A prediction rule that incorporates the patient's age at the index operation, membrane to aortic valve distance, and associated left-sided heart lesions can determine the likelihood of reintervention for recurrent SubAS.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent SubAS resection between 1984 and 2016. Our primary outcome was reintervention for recurrent SubAS after discharge. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for time-to-event analysis of any reintervention. Multivariable models were used to create a prediction rule. We excluded patients without 3 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: Of 172 patients, 21 (12.2%) required reintervention. The characteristics predicting reintervention were age younger than 2 years (P < .001), preoperative left ventricular outflow tract gradient of 65 mm Hg or more (P = .011), peeling of membrane from the mitral valve (P < .001), distance from the membrane to the aortic valve of less than 5 mm (P < .001), prior complex operation (P = .035), other left-sided heart lesions (P = .008), and aortic annulus z-score of -2.5 or less (P < .001). Our final prediction rule includes age, membrane to aortic valve distance, and other left-sided heart lesions each scored as 1 point. For patients with a score of 1 or less, 4% required a reintervention compared with 34% with a score of 2 or more.
CONCLUSIONS: A prediction rule that incorporates the patient's age at the index operation, membrane to aortic valve distance, and associated left-sided heart lesions can determine the likelihood of reintervention for recurrent SubAS.