European journal of radiology · 2024
Ultrashort VIBE-Dixon versus Cine and late gadolinium enhancement MRI sequences for cardiac thrombus detection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soschynski Martin, Capilli Fabio, Taha Hagar Muhammad, Ruile Philipp, Hein Manuel, Benndorf Matthias, Taron Jana, Schlett Christopher L, Bamberg Fabian, Krauss Tobias
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequences with fat suppression in Dixon technique (VIBE-Dixon) for cardiac thrombus detection.
METHOD: From our clinical database, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients between 2014 and 2022 who had definite diagnosis or exclusion of cardiac thrombus confirmed by an independent adjudication committee, serving as the reference standard. All patients received 2D-Cine plus 2D-Late-Gadolinium-Enhancement (Cine + LGE) and VIBE-Dixon sequences. Two blinded readers assessed all images for the presence of cardiac thrombus. The diagnostic accuracy of Cine + LGE and VIBE-Dixon was determined and compared.
RESULTS: Among 141 MRI studies (116 male, mean age: 61 years) mean image examination time was 28.8 ± 3.1 s for VIBE-Dixon and 23.3 ± 2.5 min for Cine + LGE. Cardiac thrombus was present in 49 patients (prevalence: 35 %). For both readers sensitivity for thrombus detection was significantly higher in VIBE-Dixon compared with Cine + LGE (Reader 1: 96 % vs.73 %, Reader 2: 96 % vs. 78 %, p < 0.01 for both readers), whereas specificity did not differ significantly (Reader 1: 96 % vs. 98 %, Reader 2: 92 % vs. 93 %, p > 0.1). Overall diagnostic accuracy of VIBE-Dixon was higher than for Cine + LGE (95 % vs. 89 %, p = 0.02) and was non-inferior to the reference standard (Delta ≤ 5 % with probability > 95 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Biplanar VIBE-Dixon sequences, acquired within a few seconds, provided a very high diagnostic accuracy for cardiac thrombus detection. They could be used as stand-alone sequences to rapidly screen for cardiac thrombus in patients not amenable to lengthy acquisition times.
METHOD: From our clinical database, we retrospectively identified consecutive patients between 2014 and 2022 who had definite diagnosis or exclusion of cardiac thrombus confirmed by an independent adjudication committee, serving as the reference standard. All patients received 2D-Cine plus 2D-Late-Gadolinium-Enhancement (Cine + LGE) and VIBE-Dixon sequences. Two blinded readers assessed all images for the presence of cardiac thrombus. The diagnostic accuracy of Cine + LGE and VIBE-Dixon was determined and compared.
RESULTS: Among 141 MRI studies (116 male, mean age: 61 years) mean image examination time was 28.8 ± 3.1 s for VIBE-Dixon and 23.3 ± 2.5 min for Cine + LGE. Cardiac thrombus was present in 49 patients (prevalence: 35 %). For both readers sensitivity for thrombus detection was significantly higher in VIBE-Dixon compared with Cine + LGE (Reader 1: 96 % vs.73 %, Reader 2: 96 % vs. 78 %, p < 0.01 for both readers), whereas specificity did not differ significantly (Reader 1: 96 % vs. 98 %, Reader 2: 92 % vs. 93 %, p > 0.1). Overall diagnostic accuracy of VIBE-Dixon was higher than for Cine + LGE (95 % vs. 89 %, p = 0.02) and was non-inferior to the reference standard (Delta ≤ 5 % with probability > 95 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Biplanar VIBE-Dixon sequences, acquired within a few seconds, provided a very high diagnostic accuracy for cardiac thrombus detection. They could be used as stand-alone sequences to rapidly screen for cardiac thrombus in patients not amenable to lengthy acquisition times.