DOI 10.1016/j.otoeng.2021.05.004
Clues for facial canal dehiscence in chronic otitis media.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES
The goal of this study was to determine the impact of external and middle ear findings in the incidence of facial canal dehiscence (FCD) during mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
We examined the operative details of 186 patients who underwent primary tympanomastoidectomy for chronic otitis media between January 2015 and January 2020 retrospectively. In this study we only evaluated the second portion of the facial nerve canal.
RESULTS
The global prevalence of FCD was 22.6% (42/186 patients) with a higher incidence, of 38.7% (36/93), in patients with chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma (C-COM). Associations were found between facial canal dehiscence, labyrinthine fistula (p˂ .001) and facial nerve paralysis (p˂ .001). Ossicular erosions were observed at a significant level in patients with facial canal dehiscence, the incidence of FCD was significantly higher (p=.005, Odds ratio 5.489) when malleus and incus were eroded, incus plus stapes were eroded (p=.014; OR 4.059) and malleus, incus, and stapes together were eroded (p=.002; OR 4.929).
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed an incidence of facial canal dehiscence of 22.6%. It also revealed that the presence of lateral semicircular canal fistula is associated with a higher prevalence of facial canal dehiscence. The same was noted in the case of some ossicular erosions, especially the combinations of eroded malleus and incus, incus and stapes, and all 3 ossicles. These findings raise awareness about the usefulness of middle ear findings in predicting FCD, thus providing valuable information for the otological surgeon to avoid iatrogenic injuries.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.