MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health · 1996

Seroprevalence and risk factors of human cysticercosis in a community of Shandong, China.

Cao W C, van der Ploeg C P, Gao C L, Xu J F, Cao X C, Cui Z H, Ren Z X, Habbema J D

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A community-based seroepidemiologic survey on Taenia solium cysticercosis in humans was carried out in Shandong Province, China. Blood specimens from 2,898 residents were collected and examined for anti-cysticercus antibody. Information on demographic and potential risk factors was obtained using a standardized questionnaire. The overall seroprevalence of cysticercosis was 3.2%. Seropositivity tended to increase with age ranging from 1.8% in children under 6 years of age to 5.7% in those over 60 years old. Distance between village residence and the town of the community was negatively associated with seropositivity (Chi-square for trend test p = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified four risk factors for cysticercosis infection in the community: defecating indiscriminately (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81), being unable to identify diseased pork (OR = 4.09, 95% CI 1.53-10.97), raising pigs (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.09-1.69), and more than 60 years old (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.02. These findings have implications for developing appropriate strategies for the control of Taenia solium cysticercosis in the community.

Для цитирования: Cao W C, van der Ploeg C P, Gao C L, Xu J F, Cao X C, Cui Z H, Ren Z X, Habbema J D. Seroprevalence and risk factors of human cysticercosis in a community of Shandong, China.. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. 1996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.