MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0034-89101996000300011

Медицинская библиотека · Revista de saude publica · 1996

[Frequency of anti-Cysticercus cellulosae antibodies in individuals from five counties in the Northern region of Brazil].

Lonardoni M V, Bertolini D A, Silveira T G, Arraes S M, Svidzinski T I, Cardoso R F, Gomes M L, Dias M L, Visentainer J E, Misuta N M, Ramos M, Siqueira V L

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

An epidemiological and serological study was carried out on a sample of 2,180 individuals, in five counties in the north of Paraná State-Brazil, using the indirect immunofluorescence test to detect anti-Cysticercus cellulosae antibodies. These individuals, 69 (3.2%) showed significant titers of antibodies. No single significant difference between the proportion of reactivity in Sarandi (6.6%) and in Marialva (4.7%) was observed (Z = 1,319, P = 0.0936), but it was significantly higher than that observed in Mandaguaçu, Paiçandu and Maringá (P < 0.01). Of these individuals, 47.9% were within 21-49 years old and 79.4% were of female sex. "Headache" (70.6%), "faintness" (57.4%), and "convulsions" (7.4%) were among the most frequent by reported, moreover, cases of Taenia infections (22.1%) and the custom of eating uncooked beef (41.2%) or pork (27.9%) and meat containing cysticerci (25.0%) were also related.

Для цитирования: Lonardoni M V, Bertolini D A, Silveira T G, Arraes S M, Svidzinski T I, Cardoso R F, Gomes M L, Dias M L, Visentainer J E, Misuta N M, Ramos M, Siqueira V L. [Frequency of anti-Cysticercus cellulosae antibodies in individuals from five counties in the Northern region of Brazil].. Revista de saude publica. 1996. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89101996000300011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.