The Journal of pediatrics · 2004
Brain damage in glycogen storage disease type I.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Melis Daniela, Parenti Giancarlo, Della Casa Roberto, Sibilio Michelina, Romano Alfonso, Di Salle Francesco, Elefante Raffaele, Mansi Giuseppina, Santoro Lucio, Perretti Anna, Paludetto Roberto, Sequino Luigi, Andria Generoso
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate brain morphology and function in patients with glycogen storage disease type I (GSDI).
STUDY DESIGN: Nineteen patients (13 females and 6 males, aged 0.9-22.6 years) and 38 sex- and age-matched controls entered the study. Neurological examinations, psychometric tests (IQ, tests of performance and verbal abilities), standard electroencephalogram (EEG), somatosensory (SEPs), visual (VEPs), and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed.
RESULTS: The results of tests of performance ability were lower in patients than in controls (P <.05). The prevalence of abnormal EEG findings (26.3% versus 2.6%), VEPs (38.4% versus 7.7%), SEPs (23.0% versus 0%), and BAEPs abnormalities (15.7% versus 0%) was higher in patients than in controls (P <.05). MRI pattern was altered in 57.1% of patients and was normal in all controls (P <.05). Both results of tests of performance ability and BAEPs abnormalities significantly correlated with the frequency of admissions for hypoglycemia, whereas EEG abnormalities correlated with dietary compliance (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Brain damage, probably caused by recurrent severe hypoglycemia, may be present in patients with GSDI.
STUDY DESIGN: Nineteen patients (13 females and 6 males, aged 0.9-22.6 years) and 38 sex- and age-matched controls entered the study. Neurological examinations, psychometric tests (IQ, tests of performance and verbal abilities), standard electroencephalogram (EEG), somatosensory (SEPs), visual (VEPs), and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed.
RESULTS: The results of tests of performance ability were lower in patients than in controls (P <.05). The prevalence of abnormal EEG findings (26.3% versus 2.6%), VEPs (38.4% versus 7.7%), SEPs (23.0% versus 0%), and BAEPs abnormalities (15.7% versus 0%) was higher in patients than in controls (P <.05). MRI pattern was altered in 57.1% of patients and was normal in all controls (P <.05). Both results of tests of performance ability and BAEPs abnormalities significantly correlated with the frequency of admissions for hypoglycemia, whereas EEG abnormalities correlated with dietary compliance (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Brain damage, probably caused by recurrent severe hypoglycemia, may be present in patients with GSDI.