Epilepsy research · 2016
The initial use of arterial spin labeling perfusion and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images in the diagnosis of nonconvulsive partial status epileptics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shimogawa Takafumi, Morioka Takato, Sayama Tetsuro, Haga Sei, Kanazawa Yuka, Murao Kei, Arakawa Shuji, Sakata Ayumi, Iihara Koji
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In the diagnosis of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), capture of ongoing ictal electroencephalographic (EEG) findings is the gold standard; however, this is practically difficult without continuous EEG monitoring facilities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion MRI with arterial spin labeling (ASL), have been applied mainly in emergency situations. Recent reports have described that ictal MRI findings, including ictal hyperperfusion on ASL and cortical hyperintensity of cytotoxic edema on DWI, can be obtained from epileptically activated cortex. We demonstrate the characteristics and clinical value of ictal MRI findings.
METHODS: Fifteen patients diagnosed as having NCSE (eight had complex partial status epilepticus (SE) and seven subtle SE) who underwent an initial MRI and subsequent EEG confrmation, participated in this study. Follow-up MRI and repeated routine EEG were performed.
RESULTS: In 11 patients (73%), ictal MRI findings were obtained on both DWI and ASL, while in four (27%) patients, ictal hyperperfusion was found on ASL without any DWI findings being obtained. In all 10 patients with an epileptogenic lesion, there was a tight topographical relationship between the lesion and the localization of ictal MRI findings. In the other five patients, ictal MRI findings were useful to demonstrate the pathophysiological mechanism of NCSE of non-lesional elderly epilepsy, or 'de novo' NCSE of frontal origin as situation-related NCSE. Ictal MRI findings are generally transient; however, in three cases they still persisted, even though ictal EEG findings had completely improved.
CONCLUSION: The present study clearly demonstrates that the initial use of ASL and DWI could help to diagnose partial NCSE and also combined use of the MRI and EEG allows documentation of the pathophysiological mechanism in each patient.
METHODS: Fifteen patients diagnosed as having NCSE (eight had complex partial status epilepticus (SE) and seven subtle SE) who underwent an initial MRI and subsequent EEG confrmation, participated in this study. Follow-up MRI and repeated routine EEG were performed.
RESULTS: In 11 patients (73%), ictal MRI findings were obtained on both DWI and ASL, while in four (27%) patients, ictal hyperperfusion was found on ASL without any DWI findings being obtained. In all 10 patients with an epileptogenic lesion, there was a tight topographical relationship between the lesion and the localization of ictal MRI findings. In the other five patients, ictal MRI findings were useful to demonstrate the pathophysiological mechanism of NCSE of non-lesional elderly epilepsy, or 'de novo' NCSE of frontal origin as situation-related NCSE. Ictal MRI findings are generally transient; however, in three cases they still persisted, even though ictal EEG findings had completely improved.
CONCLUSION: The present study clearly demonstrates that the initial use of ASL and DWI could help to diagnose partial NCSE and also combined use of the MRI and EEG allows documentation of the pathophysiological mechanism in each patient.