MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00381-008-0580-1

Медицинская библиотека · Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2008

Spectrum of skull base tumors in children and adolescents: a series of 42 patients and review of the literature.

Mandonnet E, Kolb F, Tran Ba Huy P, George B

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to contribute to the collective experience with the treatment of those skull base tumors exceptionally arising in children and adolescents.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients younger than 19 years and operated on for a skull base tumor between 1992 and 2002. We analyzed data regarding patient age, histology, tumor location, extent of resection, postoperative complications, and adjuvant therapies. Long-term outcomes were also tracked (functional sequelae, recurrence, mortality).

CONCLUSION

The median age was 13.75 years. Twenty-two patients harbored a malignant tumor. Gross total resection was achieved for 78% of cases. Transient postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak or infection affected ten patients, suggesting the need for reconstructive techniques. Nineteen patients received adjuvant therapy. Recurrence rate was 47%. At the end of the follow-up (median = 63 months), 14% of patients had a neurological deficit and 30% were dead. Middle cranial base tumors were associated with a poor prognosis.

Для цитирования: Mandonnet E, Kolb F, Tran Ba Huy P, George B. Spectrum of skull base tumors in children and adolescents: a series of 42 patients and review of the literature.. Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-008-0580-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.