Orthopedics · 2026
Variations in Laxity After Total Knee Arthroplasty Do Not Affect Prosthesis-generated Noise.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cozzarelli Nicholas F, Hohmann Alexandra L, Khan Irfan A, Zaid Musa B, Lonner Jess H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Prosthesis-generated noise following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may affect patient satisfaction and function. The advent of robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) allows for objective knee laxity measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare knee laxity measurements in RATKA patients with and without reported noise generation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of 133 patients who underwent primary unilateral RA-TKA from 2018 to 2021. Patients completed a survey consisting of four Likert scale questions related to prosthesis noise, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR). Intraoperative laxity measures were obtained from the robotic system and compared between patients who did and did not report noise generation.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 57.9% did not report noise and 42.1% did report noise. There were no significant differences in medial extension laxity (1.7 mm vs 1.8 mm; P = .454), lateral extension laxity (1.9 mm vs 2.0 mm; P = .567), medial flexion laxity (2.2 mm vs 2.0 mm; P = .419), and lateral flexion laxity (2.7 mm vs 2.9 mm; P = .307). Compared to patients who reported noise, those who did not had significantly higher satisfaction (94.8% vs 37.5%; P < .001), postoperative KOOS, JR scores (79.2% vs 69.7%; P = .005), and FJSs (60.3 vs 44.2; P = .002). Patients who felt noise also had higher satisfaction (90.0% vs 41.5%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: While prosthesis-generated noise symptoms affect satisfaction following TKA, variability in knee laxities does not seem to significantly affect whether a patient will experience noise following TKA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of 133 patients who underwent primary unilateral RA-TKA from 2018 to 2021. Patients completed a survey consisting of four Likert scale questions related to prosthesis noise, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR). Intraoperative laxity measures were obtained from the robotic system and compared between patients who did and did not report noise generation.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 57.9% did not report noise and 42.1% did report noise. There were no significant differences in medial extension laxity (1.7 mm vs 1.8 mm; P = .454), lateral extension laxity (1.9 mm vs 2.0 mm; P = .567), medial flexion laxity (2.2 mm vs 2.0 mm; P = .419), and lateral flexion laxity (2.7 mm vs 2.9 mm; P = .307). Compared to patients who reported noise, those who did not had significantly higher satisfaction (94.8% vs 37.5%; P < .001), postoperative KOOS, JR scores (79.2% vs 69.7%; P = .005), and FJSs (60.3 vs 44.2; P = .002). Patients who felt noise also had higher satisfaction (90.0% vs 41.5%, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: While prosthesis-generated noise symptoms affect satisfaction following TKA, variability in knee laxities does not seem to significantly affect whether a patient will experience noise following TKA.