MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/17518423.2013.830152

Медицинская библиотека · Developmental neurorehabilitation · 2013

Neuromuscular taping for the upper limb in Cerebral Palsy: A case study in a patient with hemiplegia.

Camerota Filippo, Galli Manuela, Cimolin Veronica, Celletti Claudia, Ancillao Andrea, Blow David, Albertini Giorgio

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess quantitatively the effects of Neuromuscular Taping (NMT) on the upper limb in a female child with left hemiplegia, due to Cerebral Palsy (CP).

METHODS

The patient underwent NMT on cervical level, shoulder and hand only of the plegic upper limb, followed by physical therapy. Kinematic data of upper limbs during reaching task were collected before (PRE) and after 2 weeks of treatment (POST).

RESULTS

After the intervention, the affected limb improved in terms of movement duration, Average Jerk and Number of Unit Movements indices, indicating a faster, smoother and less segmented movement. Improvements appeared at the ranges of motion of the upper limb joints, both at shoulder and elbow joints. No significant changes were globally displayed for the unaffected arm.

CONCLUSION

NMT seems to be a promising intervention for improving upper limb movement in patients with CP. Further investigations are certainly needed to assess effectively the effects of the intervention in this pathological state.

Для цитирования: Camerota Filippo, Galli Manuela, Cimolin Veronica, Celletti Claudia, Ancillao Andrea, Blow David, Albertini Giorgio. Neuromuscular taping for the upper limb in Cerebral Palsy: A case study in a patient with hemiplegia.. Developmental neurorehabilitation. 2013. DOI: 10.3109/17518423.2013.830152.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.