MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000004540

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2018

Clinical Study of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies.

Lee Dong Hoon, Yoon Tae Mi, Lee Joon Kyoo, Lim Sang Chul

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment outcomes of second branchial cleft anomalies, and to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of preoperative fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the diagnosis of branchial cleft cysts.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital from January 2010 to December 2016.

RESULTS

Among 25 patients with second branchial cleft anomalies, in 23 patients (92.0%), these anomalies presented as cysts, and in the remaining 2 patients (8.0%), these anomalies presented as fistulas. Fine-needle aspiration cytology had a diagnostic sensitivity of 100%, a positive-predictive value of 100%, and accuracy of 100% for diagnosing second branchial cleft cyst. All patients of second branchial cleft anomalies were treated surgically under general anesthesia. No recurrence of second branchial cleft anomalies was observed.

CONCLUSION

Branchial cleft cysts were the most common type of second branchial cleft anomalies. Preoperative FNAC is a useful and accurate method for preoperative evaluation of branchial cleft cysts. Surgical excision of second branchial cleft anomalies is the treatment of choice without any complications and with no recurrence.

Для цитирования: Lee Dong Hoon, Yoon Tae Mi, Lee Joon Kyoo, Lim Sang Chul. Clinical Study of Second Branchial Cleft Anomalies.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000004540.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.