MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02226.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of dermatology · 2005

Long-term follow-up study of 142 patients with vitiligo vulgaris treated by autologous, non-cultured melanocyte-keratinocyte cell transplantation.

Mulekar Sanjeev V

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Vitiligo vulgaris patients are difficult to treat surgically owing to large area involvement. Larger areas can be treated with the help of in vitro cultured melanocytes. These techniques are complex. In most of the studies published to date the number of patients reported is low and follow-up period short.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of melanocyte-keratinocyte cell transplantation in large number of vitiligo vulgaris patients.

METHODS

A simpler and modified method based on that of Olsson and Juhlin has been used. It uses shave biopsy skin sample up to 1/10th the size of recipient area. Skin sample is incubated, cells mechanically separated using trypsin-EDTA solution, and then centrifuged to prepare a suspension. Cell suspension is then applied to a dermabraded de-pigmented skin area and collagen dressing given to keep it in place.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients with vitiligo vulgaris were treated and observed for a period up to 6 years. Eighty (56%) patients showed excellent, 15 (11%) showed good, 13 (9%) showed fair and 34 (24%) showed poor repigmentation, which was retained till the end of the respective follow-up period.

Для цитирования: Mulekar Sanjeev V. Long-term follow-up study of 142 patients with vitiligo vulgaris treated by autologous, non-cultured melanocyte-keratinocyte cell transplantation.. International journal of dermatology. 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02226.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.