MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1989.tb01338.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 1989

Secondary retention of permanent molars: a histologic study.

Raghoebar G M, Boering G, Jansen H W, Vissink A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The etiology of secondary retention is not well understood, but ankylosis is often considered to be an important factor in primary molars. Data concerning the mechanism of secondary retention in the permanent dentition are insufficient, although a possible role of ankylosis has been suggested. In order to analyze the frequency of occurrence and localization of ankylosis in secondarily retained permanent teeth, 26 secondarily retained molars and for comparison six normal molars were studied histologically. These data were compared with the clinical and radiographic findings. Areas of ankylosis were observed along the roots of all secondarily retained molars. In 81% of the cases these areas were located at the bifurcation and interradicular root surface. No signs of ankylosis were found in normal molars. When these results were compared with the clinical and radiographic data, it was obvious that the latter gave many false negative results, because the areas of ankylosis were often too small to be detected clinically or radiographically.

Для цитирования: Raghoebar G M, Boering G, Jansen H W, Vissink A. Secondary retention of permanent molars: a histologic study.. Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology. 1989. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1989.tb01338.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.