Ceftaroline vs vancomycin for the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasing complication in cystic fibrosis (CF) that results in accelerated lung function decline and mortality. Vancomycin is considered a first-line intravenous treatment agent for MRSA associated acute pulmonary exacerbations (APEs); however, rates of vancomycin intolerance and resistance have been observed. These factors have led to the exploration of additional treatment options for treating MRSA associated APEs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review conducted at a CF center including patients 0 to 21 years of age with CF admitted for an APE and treated with either vancomycin or ceftaroline between January 2016 and August 2018. The primary endpoint was to determine ceftaroline efficacy compared to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA associated APEs.

RESULTS

There were 180 patients included in the study with 90 patients in each antibiotic group. Admission to discharge forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ) improved in the ceftaroline (66.5% vs 81.1%; P < .001) and vancomycin (65.5% vs 77.3%; P < .001) treatment groups. No difference existed in mean change in FEV1 (14.1% vs 13.5%; P = .25) or readmissions (15% vs 22; P = .27) between ceftaroline and vancomycin groups, respectively.

DISCUSSION: In this retrospective study, no difference existed between ceftaroline and vancomycin with regard to observed improvement in lung function from admission to discharge. Additionally, no difference was observed in mean FEV1 or readmission rate between the two groups. Ceftaroline may represent an effective and safe intravenous antimicrobial option for targeting MRSA in pediatric CF patients with APEs.