[Evaluation of a modified maxillary protraction appliance for the treatment of patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion associated with crowding].

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of a modified maxillary protraction appliance in patients of skeletal Class Ⅲ with crowding.

METHODS

Forty patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion were divided into two groups, with 20 patients in each group. The experimental group had molar in a neutral or distal relationship and applied a modified maxillary protraction appliance, while the control group had molar mesial relationship and applied a conventional maxillary protraction appliance. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment in both groups for comparison. SPSS 22.0 software package was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The angle measurements taken before and after treatment showed a significant increase in SNA, ANB, SN-MP and U4-SN(P＜0.01), while SNB decreased(P＜0.01) in both groups. SN-OL changes were statistically different before and after treatment in the experimental group(P＜0.05). The sagittal measurements before and after treatment in both groups showed significant alterations in all(P＜0.05) but the length of the maxillary arch in both groups. For vertical measurements, U1-PP, L1-MP, U4-SN, U6-SN, and ANS-ME all increased (P＜0.05), while the changes of U4-PP and U6-PP in the two groups before and after treatment were statistically different(P＜0.05). Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a significantly increased maxillary arch length, a more remote location at U6, and a less variable molar relationship after treatment(P＜0.01). The two groups showed a variable amount of cephalometric measurements before and after treatment: the experimental group had a significant increase in maxillary arch length, a more remote position at U6, and a smaller change in molar relationship compared to the control group(P＜0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified maxillary protraction appliance showed good results for maxillary protraction and pushing the molar distally in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ with crowding at neutral or distal molar relationship.