Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
Semi-quantitative indices of cardiac uptake in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis undergoing 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gallini Chiara, Tutino Francesca, Martone Raffaele, Ciaccio Alfonso, Costanzo Egidio Natalino, Taborchi Giulia, Morini Sofia, Bartolini Simone, Farsetti Silvia, Di Mario Carlo, Perfetto Federico, Cappelli Francesco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: 99mTc-HMDP scintigraphy has proved its efficacy in non-invasive diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is currently interpreted according to the Perugini qualitative assessment. Several semi-quantitative indices have been proposed to overcome inherent possible limitations of visual grading. Our aim was to comparatively evaluate six different indices and their diagnostic performance.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed scintigraphy of 76 patients (53 ATTR, 12 AL, 11 LVH) who underwent diagnostic evaluation at our centre. ROC-curve analysis was performed to identify optimal cut-off and relative diagnostic accuracy of six different indices (of which one was proposed for the first time), both in identifying CA patients and in discriminating patients according to their Perugini score.
RESULTS: Heart/Whole-body ratios proved to be the most accurate (100%) in identifying CA patients. Heart/Pelvis ratio (with soft tissue background correction) offered acceptable accuracy (98%), with the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.98) in discriminating patients with Perugini ≥ 2. Heart/Contralateral Lung ratio confirmed to be exposed to confounding background noise in case of simultaneous lung uptake. Heart/Skull ratio had the worst performance, with six false-negative patients in ATTR identification.
CONCLUSION: Heart/Whole-body ratios may be robust and effective semi-quantitative indices for the evaluation of CA by means of scintigraphy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed scintigraphy of 76 patients (53 ATTR, 12 AL, 11 LVH) who underwent diagnostic evaluation at our centre. ROC-curve analysis was performed to identify optimal cut-off and relative diagnostic accuracy of six different indices (of which one was proposed for the first time), both in identifying CA patients and in discriminating patients according to their Perugini score.
RESULTS: Heart/Whole-body ratios proved to be the most accurate (100%) in identifying CA patients. Heart/Pelvis ratio (with soft tissue background correction) offered acceptable accuracy (98%), with the largest area under the curve (AUC) (0.98) in discriminating patients with Perugini ≥ 2. Heart/Contralateral Lung ratio confirmed to be exposed to confounding background noise in case of simultaneous lung uptake. Heart/Skull ratio had the worst performance, with six false-negative patients in ATTR identification.
CONCLUSION: Heart/Whole-body ratios may be robust and effective semi-quantitative indices for the evaluation of CA by means of scintigraphy.