Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022
Critical Comparison of Documents From Scientific Societies on Cardiac Amyloidosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
СтатьяОбзорПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rapezzi Claudio, Aimo Alberto, Serenelli Matteo, Barison Andrea, Vergaro Giuseppe, Passino Claudio, Panichella Giorgia, Sinagra Gianfranco, Merlo Marco, Fontana Marianna, Gillmore Julian, Quarta Candida Cristina, Maurer Mathew S, Kittleson Michelle M, Garcia-Pavia Pablo, Emdin Michele
Аннотация
Over the last year, 5 national or international scientific societies have issued documents regarding cardiac amyloidosis (CA) to highlight the emerging clinical science, raise awareness, and facilitate diagnosis and management of CA. These documents provide useful guidance for clinicians managing patients with CA, and all include: 1) an algorithm to establish a diagnosis; 2) an emphasis on noninvasive diagnosis with the combined use of bone scintigraphy and the exclusion of a monoclonal protein; and 3) indications for novel disease-modifying therapies for symptomatic CA, either with or without peripheral neuropathy. Nonetheless, the documents diverge on specific details of diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Highlighting the similarities and differences of the documents by the 5 scientific societies with respect to diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment offers useful insight into the knowledge gaps and unmet needs in the management of CA. An analysis of these documents, therefore, highlights "gray zones" requiring further investigation.