Aging & mental health · 2023
'There's no straight line…' a consumer-informed intervention for FTD family care partners: the STELLA-FTD pilot study.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lindauer Allison, Smith Samantha, Gothard Sarah, Mattek Nora, Tran Leslie, Mooney Aimee
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Behavioral symptoms and communication challenges are particularly apparent in frontotemporal degenerative (FTD) dementias. There is a paucity of psychoeducation programming specifically tailored to the needs of families with FTD. We revised an existing intervention to meet the needs of these families.
METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental approach. In Phase 1, we sought consumer input about an existing intervention. In Phase 2, we modified the intervention based on the qualitative findings from Phase 1 and tested the revised intervention (STELLA-FTD) for feasibility, acceptability and early-stage efficacy. Outcome for Phase 2 included feasibility data and care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors. Secondary outcomes included data from unobtrusive sleep monitoring. An inductive analysis of transcripts from the Phase 2 STELLA-FTD focus group provides guidance for future revisions.
RESULTS: Fifteen family care partners participated in the Phase 1 focus groups; sixteen care partners enrolled in Phase 2. Testing in Phase 2 revealed that the care partners found our consumer-informed revised intervention both feasible and acceptable. The post-intervention findings suggest STELLA-FTD has the potential to reduce care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors and to decrease care partner burden. Sleep did not change over the 8-week intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The revised STELLA-FTD intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable, and has potential to improve care partner burden for families living with FTD. Providing the intervention via telehealth maximized access and engaged rehabilitation specialists in providing disease management content. Future revisions will include examination of efficacy and mechanism of action (OHSU IRB # 00022721, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05338710).
METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental approach. In Phase 1, we sought consumer input about an existing intervention. In Phase 2, we modified the intervention based on the qualitative findings from Phase 1 and tested the revised intervention (STELLA-FTD) for feasibility, acceptability and early-stage efficacy. Outcome for Phase 2 included feasibility data and care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors. Secondary outcomes included data from unobtrusive sleep monitoring. An inductive analysis of transcripts from the Phase 2 STELLA-FTD focus group provides guidance for future revisions.
RESULTS: Fifteen family care partners participated in the Phase 1 focus groups; sixteen care partners enrolled in Phase 2. Testing in Phase 2 revealed that the care partners found our consumer-informed revised intervention both feasible and acceptable. The post-intervention findings suggest STELLA-FTD has the potential to reduce care partner reactivity to upsetting behaviors and to decrease care partner burden. Sleep did not change over the 8-week intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The revised STELLA-FTD intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable, and has potential to improve care partner burden for families living with FTD. Providing the intervention via telehealth maximized access and engaged rehabilitation specialists in providing disease management content. Future revisions will include examination of efficacy and mechanism of action (OHSU IRB # 00022721, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05338710).