World neurosurgery · 2015
Spontaneous Regression of Pineal Lesions: Ghost Tumor or Pineal Apoplexy?
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mattogno Pier Paolo, Frassanito Paolo, Massimi Luca, Tamburrini Gianpiero, Novello Mariangela, Lauriola Libero, Caldarelli Massimo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pineal apoplexy (either hemorrhagic or ischemic) may complicate the course of a tumor at this site. This event usually is characterized by an acute clinical onset and requires emergency surgical management whereas the regression of the lesion is a much rarer outcome.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three cases of pineal vanishing tumors in the pediatric population are reported and the pertinent literature is reviewed.
RESULTS: In one case, radiologic findings were consistent with a diagnosis of pineal cyst, which became symptomatic after a spontaneous hemorrhage. This event may also explain its regression after the treatment of associated hydrocephalus. In the remaining 2 cases, neuroimaging examinations disclosed a solid tumor. One of them regressed after a surgical biopsy, probably because of an ischemic evolution, whereas the last one disappeared without any medical or surgical manipulation. Neither hemorrhage nor ischemia were noticed, thus the mechanism of regression remains controversial.
CONCLUSIONS: Vanishing tumors of the pineal region may occur in different circumstances, resulting from absence of any medical and surgical action to minor manipulation of the tumor to obtain a biopsy. This variety may reflect different underlying mechanisms, leading to hemorrhagic or ischemic change of the tumor and its subsequent regression, although radiological imaging may fail to document hemorrhage or ischemia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three cases of pineal vanishing tumors in the pediatric population are reported and the pertinent literature is reviewed.
RESULTS: In one case, radiologic findings were consistent with a diagnosis of pineal cyst, which became symptomatic after a spontaneous hemorrhage. This event may also explain its regression after the treatment of associated hydrocephalus. In the remaining 2 cases, neuroimaging examinations disclosed a solid tumor. One of them regressed after a surgical biopsy, probably because of an ischemic evolution, whereas the last one disappeared without any medical or surgical manipulation. Neither hemorrhage nor ischemia were noticed, thus the mechanism of regression remains controversial.
CONCLUSIONS: Vanishing tumors of the pineal region may occur in different circumstances, resulting from absence of any medical and surgical action to minor manipulation of the tumor to obtain a biopsy. This variety may reflect different underlying mechanisms, leading to hemorrhagic or ischemic change of the tumor and its subsequent regression, although radiological imaging may fail to document hemorrhage or ischemia.