MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0009922806289431

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical pediatrics · 2007

Clindamycin versus Unasyn in the treatment of facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin in children.

Rush Demetris E, Abdel-Haq Nahed, Zhu Jian-Fu, Aamar Basim, Malian Monica

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The study was undertaken to characterize the microbiology of dental abscesses in children and to compare clindamycin and ampicillin/sulbactam in the treatment of facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin. Sixty children with acute facial cellulitis of dental origin underwent surgery (extraction or root canal procedure) within 24 hours of presentation. Pus samples were cultured aerobically and anaerobically. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam or clindamycin for 48 hours followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate or clindamycin for 7 days. A total of 211 bacterial isolates were recovered from 54 samples. The most common aerobic and facultative organisms were viridans streptococci, Neisseria, and Eikenella species. Among anaerobes, Prevotella and Peptostreptococcus species were the most frequent. No treatment failure occurred in either group. Dental abscesses in children are polymicrobial aerobic/anaerobic infections. Treatment of complicated dental infections with ampicillin plus a beta-lactamase inhibitor or clindamycin in combination with surgical drainage is very effective.

Для цитирования: Rush Demetris E, Abdel-Haq Nahed, Zhu Jian-Fu, Aamar Basim, Malian Monica. Clindamycin versus Unasyn in the treatment of facial cellulitis of odontogenic origin in children.. Clinical pediatrics. 2007. DOI: 10.1177/0009922806289431.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.