MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.10082

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2002

Omental free flap reconstruction in complex head and neck deformities.

Losken Albert, Carlson Grant W, Culbertson John H, Scott Hultman C, Kumar Ajay V, Jones Glyn E, Bostwick John, Jurkiewicz Maurice J

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Microvascular free flaps continue to revolutionize coverage options in head and neck reconstruction. This article reviews our 25-year experience with omental free tissue transfers.

METHODS

All patients who underwent free omental transfer to the head and neck region were reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included with omental transfers to the scalp (25%), craniofacial (62%), and neck (13%) region. Indications were tumor resections, burn wound, hemifacial atrophy, trauma, and moyamoya disease. Average follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 2 months-13 years). Donor site morbidities included abdominal wound infection, gastric outlet obstruction, and postoperative bleeding. Recipient site morbidities included partial flap loss in four patients (7%) total flap loss in two patients (3.6%), and three hematomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The omental free flap has acceptable abdominal morbidity and provides sufficient soft tissue coverage with a 96.4% survival. The thickness \and versatility of omentum provide sufficient contour molding for craniofacial reconstruction. It is an attractive alternative for reconstruction of large scalp defects and badly irradiated tissue.

Для цитирования: Losken Albert, Carlson Grant W, Culbertson John H, Scott Hultman C, Kumar Ajay V, Jones Glyn E, Bostwick John, Jurkiewicz Maurice J. Omental free flap reconstruction in complex head and neck deformities.. Head & neck. 2002. DOI: 10.1002/hed.10082.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.